DELHI ROCKS

Weather in Delhi is just AWESOME for the last 3 days, and its been justa great weekend, looking through the balcony and sipping tea/coffee all the time...It was rather LAZY coz i ended up watching 4 episodes of FRIENDS and fininshing KING ARTHUR....

Love

SA

Read more...

FROG Story-Sweet and Inspiring (be DEAF and u will be HAPPY)

Read more...

AIG Bailed Out- Excerpt from Wall Street Journal

The U.S. government seized control of American International Group Inc. -- one of the world's biggest insurers -- in an $85 billion deal that signaled the intensity of its concerns about the danger a collapse could pose to the financial system.

The step marks a dramatic turnabout for the federal government, which had been strongly resisting overtures from AIG for an emergency loan or some intervention that would prevent the insurer from falling into bankruptcy. Just last weekend, the government essentially pulled the plug on Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., allowing the big investment bank to go under instead of giving it financial support. This time, the government decided AIG truly was too big to fail.
[Businessmen leave an American International Group office building, Tuesday, Sept. 16, 2008 in New York. Worries about AIG] Associated Press



Businessmen leave an American International Group office building Tuesday in New York.

The U.S. negotiators drove a hard bargain. Under terms hammered out Tuesday night, the Fed will lend up to $85 billion to AIG, and the U.S. government will effectively get a 79.9% equity stake in the insurer in the form of warrants called equity participation notes. The two-year loan will carry an interest rate of Libor plus 8.5 percentage points. (Libor, the London interbank offered rate, is a common short-term lending benchmark.)

The loan is secured by AIG's assets, including its profitable insurance businesses, giving the Fed some protection even if markets continue to sink. And if AIG rebounds, taxpayers could reap a big profit through the government's equity stake.

"This loan will facilitate a process under which AIG will sell certain of its businesses in an orderly manner, with the least possible disruption to the overall economy," the Fed said in a statement.

It puts the government in control of a private insurer -- a historic development, particularly considering that AIG isn't directly regulated by the federal government. The Fed took the highly unusual step using legal authority granted in the Federal Reserve Act, which allows it to lend to nonbanks under "unusual and exigent" circumstances, something it invoked when Bear Stearns Cos. was rescued in March.

As part of the deal, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson insisted that AIG's chief executive, Robert Willumstad, step aside. Mr. Paulson personally told Mr. Willumstad the news in a phone call on Tuesday, according to a person familiar with the call.

Mr. Willumstad will be succeeded by Edward Liddy, the former head of insurer Allstate Corp.

AIG's bailout caps a tumultuous 10 days that have remade the American financial system. In that time, the government has engineered rescues that insert it deep into the housing and insurance industries, while Wall Street has watched two of its last four big independent brokerage firms exit the scene.

The U.S. on Sept. 6 took over mortgage-lending giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as they teetered near collapse. This Sunday, the U.S. refused to bail out Wall Street pillar Lehman Brothers, which filed for bankruptcy-court protection and is now being sold off in pieces. That same day, another struggling Wall Street titan, Merrill Lynch & Co., agreed to sell itself to Bank of America Corp.

View Slideshow
[SB122148637397236285]

The AIG deal followed a day of high drama in Washington. The Treasury's Mr. Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke convened in the early evening an unexpected meeting of top congressional leaders. Late in the trading day Tuesday, anticipation that the government might assist the insurer helped propel the Dow Jones Industrial Average to a 1.3% gain.

In bailing out AIG, the Federal Reserve appeared to be motivated in part by worries that Wall Street's financial crisis could begin to spill over into seemingly safe investments held by small investors, such as money-market funds that invest in AIG debt.

Indeed, on Tuesday the $62 billion Primary Fund from the Reserve, a New York money-market firm, said it "broke the buck" -- that is, its net asset value fell below the $1-a-share level that funds like this must maintain. Breaking the buck is an extremely rare occurrence. The fund was pinched by investments in bonds issued by now collapsing Lehman Brothers.

Money-market funds are supposed to be among the safest investments available. No fund in the $3.6 trillion money-market industry has lost money since 1994, when Orange County, Calif., went bankrupt. A number of money-market funds own securities issued by AIG. The firm is also a big insurer of some money-market instruments.
Credit Downgrade

AIG's financial crisis intensified Monday night when its credit rating was downgraded, forcing it to post $14.5 billion in collateral. The insurer has far more than that in assets that it could sell, but it could not get the cash quickly enough to satisfy the collateral demands. That explains the interest in obtaining a bridge loan to carry it through. AIG's board approved the rescue Tuesday night.

AIG's board said in a statement that the deal would "protect all AIG policyholders, address rating agency concerns and give AIG the time necessary to conduct asset sales on an orderly basis."

The final decision to help AIG came Tuesday as the federal government concluded it would be "catastrophic" to allow the insurer to fail, according to a person familiar with the matter. Over the weekend, federal officials had tried to get the private sector to pony up some funds. But when that effort failed, Fed Chairman Bernanke, New York Fed President Timothy Geithner and Treasury Secretary Paulson concluded that federal assistance was needed to avert an AIG bankruptcy, which they feared could have disastrous repercussions.

Staff from the Federal Reserve and Treasury worked on the plan through Monday night. President George W. Bush was briefed on the rescue Tuesday afternoon during a meeting of the President's Working Group on Financial Markets.

That the government would prop up AIG financially offers a stark indication of the breadth of the insurer's role in the global economy. If it were to have trouble meeting its obligations, the potential domino effect could reach around the world.

For one thing, banks and mutual funds are major holders of AIG's debt and could take a hit if the insurer were to default. In addition, AIG was a major seller of "credit-default swaps," essentially insurance against default on assets tied to corporate debt and mortgage securities. Weakness at AIG could force financial institutions in the U.S., Europe and Asia that bought these swaps to take write-downs or losses.
Crisis on Wall Street

* Greenberg's Letter to AIG CEO Willumstad
* Wash Wire: Bush Not to Comment on Paulson Meeting
* Crisis Blog: Questions and Answers on AIG
* AIG, Lehman Shock Hits World Markets
* Old-School Banks Emerge on Top
* Complete Coverage: Wall Street in Crisis

AIG's millions of insurance policyholders appear to be considerably less at risk. That's because of how the company is structured and regulated. Its insurance policies are issued by separate subsidiaries of AIG, highly regulated units that have assets available to pay claims. In the U.S., those assets can't be shifted out of the subsidiaries without regulatory approval, and insurance is also regulated strictly abroad.

Tuesday afternoon, after the market closed, AIG put out a statement saying its basic insurance and retirement services businesses are "fully capable of meeting their obligations to policyholders." AIG said it was trying to "increase short-term liquidity in the parent company," but said that didn't "include any effort to reduce the capital of any of its subsidiaries or to tap into Asian operations for liquidity." Asia is one of AIG's largest markets.
Financial Pain

Where the company is feeling financial pain is at the corporate level, even while its insurance operations are healthy.

The urgency of federal aid came into stark relief Tuesday as other options fell off the table and pressures continued to build. On Tuesday, AIG's attempt to raise as much as $75 billion from private-sector banks failed. The banks advising the firm concluded it would be all but impossible to organize a loan of that size, making the government AIG's chief hope.

As a result of its credit downgrades, the insurer has to post $14.5 billion in collateral to bolster its credit rating. In the debt markets, AIG also has to post additional collateral to investment banks and others it trades with.

Adding to AIG's woes, investors continued to pummel the company's stock on Tuesday, pushing the share price down 21%, to $3.75. It was the third double-digit percentage decline in the past three trading days. AIG's shares are now down 94% for the year.

AIG's cash squeeze is driven in large part by losses in a unit separate from its traditional insurance businesses. That financial-products unit, which has been a part of AIG for years, sold the credit-default swap contracts designed to protect investors against default in an array of assets, including subprime mortgages.

But as the housing market has crumbled, the value of those contracts has dropped sharply, driving $18 billion in losses over the past three quarters and forcing AIG to put up billions of dollars in collateral. AIG raised $20 billion earlier this year. But the ongoing demands are straining the holding company's resources.

That strain contributed to the ratings downgrades on Monday. Those downgrades, in turn, ratcheted up the pressure on the company to come up with more cash, quickly.

Most insurance companies don't have financial-products units like these. But over nearly four decades, former CEO, Maurice R. "Hank" Greenberg built AIG into a firm that resembled no other. He transformed its insurance business, both by expanding abroad -- notably in China, where AIG has its roots -- and by buying up other firms.
[AIG chart]

Mr. Greenberg pushed into areas that have little to do with bread-and-butter businesses like selling life insurance or protecting companies against property losses. In 1990, for instance, he bought International Lease Finance Corp., which leases planes to airlines.

In 2005, Mr. Greenberg stepped down amid an accounting scandal. But Mr. Greenberg, who is fighting civil charges related to the scandal and has denied wrongdoing, didn't fade from the scene. He still heads a firm that is AIG's largest shareholder, and on Tuesday, he sent a letter to current CEO, Mr. Willumstad, saying he was "ready to offer any assistance that I can."
'I'll Do It'

Now, however, Mr. Willumstad himself will be leaving, after having been asked to step aside by the Treasury's Mr. Paulson. Mr. Willumstad, who recently took over as AIG's chief executive to try to turn around the firm, was surprised by the request. "If that's what you want, I'll do it," he said to Mr. Paulson, according to a person familiar with the call. AIG's board was unhappy with the decision but felt it had no choice but to go along, as the only other option was bankruptcy.

The fate of a corporate chief executive is normally the province of a board of directors. The decision by the Treasure Secretary to essentially oust Mr. Willumstad underscores further the magnitude of the government's intervention.

Mr. Willumstad's departure marks the end of a brief, tumultuous run. He joined AIG as a director in early 2006, after leaving the No. 2 post at Citigroup Inc., and became AIG's chairman later that year. In June, as AIG was reeling from record losses, the board forced out Mr. Willumstad's predecessor and gave him the top job. He had planned to unveil his own strategy for AIG on Sept. 25.

By tapping Mr. Liddy as AIG's next CEO, the government is turning to someone with deep experience in the insurance industry, having served as chief executive of Allstate from 1999 to 2006. He stepped down as chairman earlier this year. Allstate is a different type of insurer than AIG, focusing on selling car and home insurance to Americans, whereas AIG sells an array of insurance policies to individuals and businesses world-wide.

Mr. Liddy also has experience pulling apart empires, having helped dismantle Sears, Roebuck & Co. (from which Allstate was spun off) in the 1990s. Before joining Sears, Mr. Liddy worked under Donald Rumsfeld at drug maker G.D. Searle & Co. Mr. Liddy is on the board at Goldman Sachs Group, the investment bank that Mr. Paulson led before becoming Treasury Secretary.

As confidence in AIG declined recently, the amount of money it felt compelled to raise to calm its constituents continued to rise. Over the weekend, the figure was $40 billion. That climbed to $75 billion on Monday and, according to a person close to the company, rose further on Tuesday.

Read more...

Movie Review- A Wednesday

Though i am late, but i think i have been lucky on not having missed an opportunity to review and watch such a GREAT movie....It is only in decades you see something so flawless and amazing and without any doubt its going to me the most acclaimed and debatable movie of the year....The movie proves very strongly that in Bollyowood, u dont need a Srk or Amitabh to make it a commercial success....The movie also reiterates the greatness of Naseeruddin Shah and Anupam Kher's performances and its just a treat to all the viewers....Despite covering a topic on which 1 in every 5 film is based on these days (BLASTS) the movie has enough suspense and thrill to keep u on the edge throughout

The movie starts with Anupam Kher, Commissioner of Police sitting at Nariman Point (Mumbai)telling the story about the secretly guarded case which was closest to his heart, but coz it was highly confidential that no one ever came to know abt it. The case deals with Naseeruddin Shah who plants Bombs in Mumbai and calls the commissioner to give him the news and his demands...He demands freedom of 4 terrorist, 2 of whom had been captured by Anupam Kher....The movie is just awesome, with Naseeruddin sitting cooly on a terrace of a under construction buliding monitoring the progress of the Police on a TV and communicating via his Laptop and "n" number of sim cards.....Naseeruddin Shah's planning is impecable and the ease with he plants 5 bombs in the city speaks about the THREAT that we in our daily lives face coz of such hate filled and brain washed terrorists.....All attempts to find out the identity and location of Naseer fails and the police is forced to humbl accept all his demands and conditions....

Its hard to judge who amongst the veterans has acted better coz both of them just blow ur mind off....Jimmy Shergill in a short role as a Police Inspector is awesome, and Deepal Shaw with her irritating voice as a Media representative working for a News Channel is tolerable.....

Movie deserves 8/10, and its a 2 hour treat at the end of which u will too have your own opinion or conclusion.....

Luv

SA


Read more...

Movie Review-The Last Lear

Its an ok kind of a movie, nothing great. There are some scenes in the movie which are really good, but thats very common on AB to give his Midas touch to some simple scenes in any movie and prove that he is the best. Watch it in a CD, dont waste hard earned money in the theatre.
BASED on Utpal Dutt's classic play, Aajker Shahenshah, The Last Lear is a sad example

of how adaptation can sometimes scuttle a good script and transform a landmark theatrical experience into flawed cinema. The film only works for Amitabh Bachchan aficionados who can savour the desi bard bellowing out the best of Shakespeare in his characteristic baritone. The actor still manages to create magic moments on the screen as he portrays the arrogance and the naked need of a has-been actor who believes he is always good, simply because he can never be bad. Yet, he clings desperately to his last chance to display histrionics and is even ready to grovel before the filmmaker for his famous last shot. The film traces the resurrection of Harry (Amitabh), a retired actor who lives in a dimly-lit house with memories of a glorious past, until he is pulled out of anonymity by Sid (Arjun Rampal), the avant garde filmmaker who wants to make a realistic film. After some drunken camaraderie, Harry consents to play the clown in the movie and forges a friendship with both the director and the lead actress, Preity Zinta. But, when the curtains go up, and the accolades begin to pour in after the premier, Harry is back behind the tightly shut blinds of his house and the show simply goes on: ruthlessly, selfishly, unkindly. It's a poignant story that loses most of its bite because of the rambling screenplay and the unnecessary subplot about emotionally battered women and feminist wailing. Preity Zinta, Shefali Shah and Divya Dutta form a chest-beating sisterhood that consumes most of the screen time with their pointless tales of emotional abuse. Also, the story is told by a narrator who gives a whiny voice-over that rids the film of all its subtlety. Add to this, the unconvincing climax, and you have a film that becomes watchable, here and there: when Arjun Rampal and Amitabh Bachchan indulge in creative banter.


Read more...

LANCE is back....Read its not about the BIKE to know more abt him

Lance Armstrong is ready to swear off the chips and salsa, climb back on the bike and win an eighth Tour de France. Three years after retiring, the 36-year-old says he'll return to competition and the Tour de France in 2009, giving up relaxed days of a few beers and Tex-Mex food for a self-described monk's life of disciplined training and punishing races.

In a formal statement Armstrong called his comeback an attempt to raise global awareness in his fight against cancer. Just as likely, it's also about his relentless desire to compete and win, especially at the Tour, the race he dominated with a record seven titles from 1999-2005.

Citing the slow pace of last year's Tour and the rush from last month's Leadville 100 race, Armstrong decided it was time to return.

"This kind of obscure bike race, totally kick-started my engine," he told Vanity Fair in an exclusive interview, referring to the lung-searing 100-mile mountain bike race through the Colorado Rockies. "I'm going to try and win an eighth Tour de France."

Armstrong's riveting victories over cancer and opponents on the bike, his work for cancer awareness and his gossip-page romances have made him a modern-day American icon.

Professional cycling and particularly the Tour have missed Armstrong's star power, even though skeptics refused to believe he could win without the help of illegal performance-enhancing drugs.

This time, Armstrong's determined to silence the doubters and try to prove he really is clean.

He's even hired a video crew to chronicle his training for 2009, as well as his drug tests, for a possible documentary. (Will grab the documentary as soon as it is released)

"There's this perception in cycling that this generation is now the cleanest generation we've had in decades, if not forever," said Armstrong, who's never tested positive. "And the generation that I raced with was the dirty generation. ... So there is a nice element here where I can come with really a completely comprehensive program and there will be no way to cheat."

And if he has his way, no way to lose.

"We're not going to try to win second place," Bill Stapleton, Armstrong's lawyer and longtime confidant, told The Associated Press.

Diagnosed in 1996 with testicular cancer that had spread to his lungs and brain, doctors gave Armstrong less than a 50 percent chance of survival. Surgery and brutal cycles of chemotherapy saved his life.

From there, it was determination and powerful self-discipline that led him back to the bike and his stunning 1999 Tour win.

Armstrong's goal every year was to win the Tour, and he dominated the Pyrenees and Alps like no other rider ever had. This time, he wants to win for his millions of supporters and more important, the 8 million who will die of cancer just this year.

"I am happy to announce that after talking with my children, my family and my closest friends, I have decided to return to professional cycling in order to raise awareness of the global cancer burden," Armstrong said in a statement released to The Associated Press. "This year alone, nearly eight million people will die of cancer worldwide. ... It's now time to address cancer on a global level."

In a video on his foundation's Web site, Armstrong said details of the comeback — such as a team and schedule — will be announced Sept. 24 at the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City.

The 2009 Tour "is the intention," Armstrong's spokesman Mark Higgins told The Associated Press, "but we've got some homework to do over there."

"I think it's great," said longtime teammate George Hincapie, who added he spoke to Armstrong on Tuesday morning. "He's done more than anyone for the sport especially in America and around the world."

But what will he have to do to make a successful comeback?

For starters, he plans to train in Aspen, Colo., in rigorous conditions similar to what he would face in Europe.

Armstrong will be 37 next week. Only one rider older than 34 has ever won the Tour — 36-year-old Firmin Lambot in 1922. And Armstrong wasn't impressed by the crop of younger riders in the 2008 Tour.

"It's not a secret. I mean, the pace was slow," he told Vanity Fair.

Armstrong noted other athletes in his age range competing at a high level, specifically 41-year-old Olympic medalist swimmer Dara Torres and 38-year-old Olympic women's marathon champion Constantina Tomescu-Dita, of Romania.

"Ask serious sports physiologists and they'll tell you age is a wives' tale," he said.

Torres certainly agrees.

"To hear that he's making a comeback, that just shows what kind of athlete he is and that he doesn't think age is anything but a number," she said from her Florida home.

>
Read more!
Armstrong also must line up a team. His U.S. Postal Service and Discovery teams were loaded with top lieutenants, such as Hincapie, when he won his previous titles.

On Monday, the cycling journal VeloNews reported on its Web site that Armstrong would compete with the Astana team in the Tour and four other road races — the Amgen Tour of California, Paris-Nice, the Tour de Georgia and the Dauphine-Libere.

Armstrong's close friend and longtime team director, Johan Bruyneel, now with team Astana, sent a text message to the AP declining comment.

But there are no guarantees Astana will race the 2009 Tour. Race officials kept the team out this year because of previous doping violations. Tour director Christian Prudhomme did not return messages seeking comment on Armstrong's decision.

If Armstrong and his team aren't invited in 2009, he plans to appeal directly to French President Nicolas Sarkozy.

"I've already put a call in to him," he said.

Off the bike, the Lance Armstrong Foundation has raised hundreds of millions of dollars for cancer awareness and survivorship programs. Its yellow "Livestrong" wristbands that started selling in 2004 are still seen everywhere — with many copycats.

After he retired Armstrong took on cancer as a political issue, lobbying federal and state lawmakers and co-hosting televised forums with presidential candidates. He can rally millions of his "Livestrong Army" through his Web site to support cancer causes.

He was instrumental in persuading the 2007 Texas Legislature to pass a $3 billion fund for cancer research.

"This is a damn war for me. It's nothing other than that," Armstrong told The Associated Press in 2007.

His social life has done just as much to keep him in the spotlight.

After his divorce from wife Kristin, the mother of his three children, Armstrong has had high-profile relationships with rocker Sheryl Crow, fashion designer Tory Burch and most recently, actress Kate Hudson.>

Luv

SA
>

Read more...

TAHAAN - MUST WATCH

Indeed a very beautiful movie set on the background of paradise on earth.....the story is so simple and innocent.....maybe the last five minutes could have been shown differently, but then any ending would have conveyed the message......
Read more...

Moviw Review- TAHAAN (2008)

We recommend this movie, Ratings - 7/10

TAHAAN, the story of a boy with a grenade, is a beautiful 2 hr movie, which will definitely take you back to childhood....Its a must watch for all the kids and MOMMIES and DADDIES, coz there it is a story with a very good moral messages.....The story is very very simple and mixes the two extremes, horrifing TERRORISM with innocent CHILDHOOD.....

Tahaan, is a 8 year old kid whose best buddy Birbal is a DONKEY....

He spends all his time talking and playing with him, and a life without BIRBAL is just something impossible for Tahaan to even dream of...Born in a very poor home, with his DAD missing for over 3 years and his Grand father (Victor Banerjee, in a guest appearance) dying early, the family faces extreme financial crisis, and is forced to sell all the belongings including Birbal....The kid is devastated to find out that the donkey has been sold to the local merchant (Rahul Khanna) as payment of interest to their huge loans....The merchant in turn sells the donkey to Anupam Kher (Saif Baba) who is a local trader, makingc ommercial goods available at far off places in Kashmir.....Tahaan, follows Saif Baba everywhere and even works for him to convince him to return the donkey....Rahul Bose (playing the role of a moron, as a helper to Saif Baba) is just awesome, and has played his small part beautifully.....Tahaan realizes that Saif Baba would not return Birbal to him, falls in the hands of young terrorist (Itriz Bhai) who uses Tahaan to transport Bombs across the the valley to blow a army contanment....Tahaan, an innocent 8 year old does all this to get his Donkey back....
The story does not have much to offer other than the freshness and beauty of childhood, and the climax of the movie wid a kid carrying a BOMB in his pocket everywhere and hiding it in his house is just awesome....Itriz bhai even teaches the style of using a bomb and TAHAAN is given a last task by him before BIRBAL would be returned to him.....The end keeps you on the edge, and hatred towards TERRORISTS and TERRORISM is only aggravated by such motives....

Performances, well Purav Bhandre as TAHAAN is as convincing as the kid from Taree Zameen Par, and Anupam Kher and Rahul Bose with their small role provide the right kind of tone to the movie....Rahul Khanna and Victor Banerjee appear on the screen for just 5 minutes each and look good playing their part well...The USP of the movie is the kid and the amazing LOCALES.....Kashmir should be used more regularly in Bollywood, and i think a lot of cost can be cut by not resorting to the foreign locales....

All in all, a story beautifully told, with small roles for each character without the acrlights being taken away from TAHAAN in any of the scenes.....No songs and no item nos can however make the movie commerically non profitable but such a beautiful story deserves to be told and i expect it to be a hit in urban citites and towns atleast...

LUV

SA

Read more...

ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING

Jerry was the kind of guy you love to hate. He was always in a good mood and always had something positive to say. When someone would ask him how he was doing, he would reply, "If I were any better, I would be twins!"
He was a unique manager because he had several waiters who had followed him around from restaurant to restaurant. The reason the waiters followed Jerry was because of his attitude....
He was a natural motivator. If an employee was having a bad day, Jerry was there telling the employee how to look on the positive side of the situation.
Seeing this style really made me curious, so one day I went up to Jerry and asked him, "I don't get it! You can't be a positive person all of the time. How do you do it?"
Jerry replied, "Each morning I wake up and say to myself, 'Jerry, you have two choices today. You can choose to be in a good mood or you can choose to be in a bad mood.' I choose to be in a good mood. Each time something bad happens, I can choose to be a victim or I can choose to learn from it. I choose to learn from it. Every time someone comes to me complaining, I can choose to accept their complaining or I can point out the positive side of life. I choose the positive side of life."
"Yeah, right, it's not that easy," I protested.
"Yes, it is," Jerry said. "Life is all about choices. When you cut way all the junk, every situation is a choice. You choose how you react to situations. You choose how people will affect your mood. You choose to be in a good mood or bad mood. The bottom line: It's your choice how you live life."
I reflected on what Jerry said. Soon thereafter, I left the restaurant industry to start my own business. We lost touch, but I often thought about him when I made a choice about life instead of reacting to it.
Several years later, I heard that Jerry did something you are never supposed to do in a restaurant business: he left the back door open one morning and was held up at gunpoint by three armed robbers. While trying to open the safe, his hand, shaking from nervousness, slipped off the combination. The robbers panicked and shot him. Luckily, Jerry was found relatively quickly and rushed to the local trauma center.
After 18 hours of surgery and weeks of intensive care, Jerry was released from the hospital with fragments of the bullets still in his body.
I saw Jerry about six months after the accident. When I asked him how he was, he replied, "If I were any better, I'd be twins. Wanna see my scars?"
I declined to see his wounds, but did ask him what had gone through his mind as the robbery took place. "The first thing that went through my mind was that I should have locked the back door," Jerry replied. "Then, as I lay on the floor, I remembered that I had two choices: I could choose to live, or I could choose to die. I chose to live."
"Weren't you scared? Did you lose consciousness?" I asked.
Jerry continued, "The paramedics were great. They kept telling me I was going to be fine. But when they wheeled me into the emergency room and I saw the expressions on the faces of the doctors and nurses, I got really scared. In their eyes, I read, 'He's a dead man.'
"I knew I needed to take action."
"What did you do?" I asked.
"Well, there was a big, burly nurse shouting questions at me," said Jerry. "She asked if I was allergic to anything. 'Yes,' I replied. The doctors and nurses stopped working as they waited for my reply. I took a deep breathe and yelled, 'Bullets!' Over their laughter, I told them. 'I am choosing to live. Operate on me as if I am alive, not dead."
Jerry lived thanks to the skill of his doctors, but also because of his amazing attitude. I learned from him that every day we have the choice to live fully. Attitude, after all, is everything

Read more...

Movie Review-ROCK ON (Revised)

Hey Guys,

I am sorry for disappointing you this time coz i cd nt give a fair review...May b my expectations from the movie were a bit high, anyway by the kind of responses i have gt from the review panel and also the readers, i think the one from PJ (Payal) deserves a mention as a post....Read comments on my previous entry to know more abt the movie....The revised blog has been posted by my sis PJ (Payal).....

Payal
Sorry bro... i disagree with the harsh review u have made...guess u were looking for another DCH /RDB or perhaps a srk flik..i think the movie was really good..for me the movie was about catchin up on ur dreams..about havin the nerve to come back to ppl u left long back n to pursue somethin which gives u happiness...the guys wantin to play rock music when they are twenty somethings is very normally seen.. but them yearnin to do the same even after ten yrs when most of them are settled in life is wat makes the movie worth watchin..i do agree with u on the movie being showcased on a glooomy screen (even i prefer some brightness)..but i guess the movie is tryin to catch on the spirit of the theme i.e. rock music.havent we seen most of the rock videos in that kind of cinematography...but anyways,i think its been very well told..some scenes were amazing..for eg :one where arjun tells his wife "haan hamesha pata bandh ke tumhare paas rahunga" is so real, the rockstars playin at dandia was hilarious though fully in sync with the movie..Prachi played the perfect wife..farhan has also done his "upset with life" job quite well (did u notice he switches off FM in his car the moment he hears music),also joe's wife debi was quite pragmatic..the amazing music made the movie all the more watchable..the song i loved the most is " asman ye neela gyun hai,pani gila gila kyun hia,socho zara" i will give the movie a 7.5/10

Read more...